Life Sciences
Molecular biology, genetics, cell physiology, algal biotechnology and laboratory-based experimental research.
I work at the intersection of life sciences, scientific data analysis and research software — translating complex experimental data into reproducible workflows, interactive tools and understandable results.
Connected profile
The orbiting fields show how my work connects life sciences, experimental research, scientific data analysis and research software. Select a field to inspect it, or click the core to return to this overview.
My strongest work emerges where biological questions, data structures and software development meet. I particularly value careful documentation, reproducible analysis and tools that make complex scientific information easier to explore.
Molecular biology, genetics, cell physiology, algal biotechnology and laboratory-based experimental research.
R, Shiny, SQL, reproducible reports, data pipelines and interactive scientific applications.
Statistical reasoning, data visualisation, structured interpretation and transparent communication of limitations.
Click a field to reveal how it connects to my current experience and future direction.
Cultivation, physiology and bioenergy applications of microalgae.
My experience includes cultivation experiments, photosynthetic measurements, biochemical analyses, anaerobic digestion and environmental-data integration.
Reproducible and scalable data workflows for research.
I develop R-based pipelines, Shiny applications, database workflows and automated reports for biological and large-scale datasets.
Interfaces that make complex measurements understandable.
I am interested in dashboards and exploratory tools that connect raw data, statistical results and scientific interpretation.
Understanding biological function through molecular and computational evidence.
My academic background includes genetics, genome research, molecular biology and functional-genomics coursework and laboratory practice.
Choosing analyses that respect the data and the research question.
I work with descriptive statistics, assumptions, parametric and non-parametric tests, visual diagnostics and reproducible reporting.
Connecting measurements, documentation and analysis.
I am interested in systems that reduce manual transfer, improve traceability and support collaborative scientific workflows.
This map distinguishes between skills applied independently, practised in projects or laboratories, studied through coursework, and areas still being developed. It reflects actual experience rather than examination outcomes alone.
Scientific analysis, application development and reproducible data infrastructure.
Experimental work from cultivation and physiology to biochemical composition and bioenergy.
Coursework and laboratory foundations in genetics, cell biology, physiology and genomics.
Foundational study and laboratory exposure across general, organic and physical chemistry.
From experimental documentation to manuscript preparation and transparent analysis.
An interactive overview of how my laboratory, analytical and software skills connect in one research process.
Maintaining algal cultures and comparing experimental conditions provides the biological foundation for the workflow.
Sampling links time, treatment, culture and downstream measurements. Clear identifiers and documentation are essential.
Laboratory work includes biomass, pigment, protein and nutrient-related analyses as well as anaerobic digestion experiments.
Experimental observations combine biological, biochemical, gas-chromatographic and weather-station measurements.
Laboratory and environmental records are cleaned, harmonised and prepared for reproducible analysis.
Analyses are selected according to the research question, distributions and assumptions, with limitations documented openly.
Interactive applications can connect uploads, databases, statistics, visualisation and automated reports.
Scientific writing completes the workflow through interpretation, figure preparation and manuscript development.
My work combined cultivation, physiological and biochemical measurements, bioenergy experiments, environmental monitoring and automated data analysis. This created a multidisciplinary workflow extending from biological material to reproducible interpretation.
Initiated as lead author within the context of algal-biotechnology research. The work involves scientific structuring, interpretation and manuscript development.
Contribution as a co-author to a further scientific manuscript, supporting research documentation, analysis or interpretation.
Two applications are publicly accessible and can be explored directly. They demonstrate how I combine scientific data analysis, structured documentation and accessible workflow design in R Shiny.
A research-oriented Shiny application for exploring, processing and visualising experimental algal data. It demonstrates the direction of my bachelor project: bringing laboratory measurements, statistical analysis and understandable visual outputs into one reproducible interface.
The live Shiny app is embedded only when requested, preventing unnecessary loading time on the portfolio page.
A structured planning and documentation application developed to break a complex personal-budget and assistance workflow into manageable areas, tasks and records. It is a practical example of software designed around real accessibility needs rather than around an abstract technical exercise.
Load the application inside the portfolio or open it separately for the full interface.
During my six-month internship at the Bertelsmann Stiftung Data Science Lab, I worked with large governmental datasets and developed R-based analytical and data-processing workflows.
A concept for an interactive, spatially oriented municipal-data platform combining structured indicators, maps and exploratory analysis.
Six-month internship, extended from an initial three months, involving large governmental datasets and R-based analytical workflows.
Experimental and computational work spanning algal cultivation, physiological and biochemical measurement, environmental records and automated analysis.
Practical service experience involving customer communication, retail operations, logistics and technical bicycle-related tasks.
This section separates personal reflection on learning and cognitive working patterns from documented professional assessments. Together, they show both how I process complex information and how those abilities have been reflected in structured workplace reviews.
Self-reflection based on long-term interdisciplinary learning, scientific work and practical software development.
Combined scores from structured self-assessment and team-leader questionnaires discussed in individual, mid-year and annual review meetings.
I learn most effectively by understanding the underlying principles of a system rather than memorising isolated steps. Once the conceptual structure is clear, I can usually reconstruct details independently and transfer the same reasoning to unfamiliar problems.
A single well-structured explanation is usually enough for me to understand a new concept and begin applying it independently.
Strength: fast comprehensionI naturally look for relationships, dependencies and underlying mechanisms instead of treating information as disconnected facts.
Strength: structural understandingI connect recurring structures across biology, chemistry, statistics, data science and software development, making it easier to apply knowledge across disciplines.
Strength: interdisciplinary transferOnce the foundations are understood, I usually continue through literature, experimentation and implementation without needing repeated instruction.
Strength: self-directed learningThe professional radar summarises recurring employee-development assessments completed through self-evaluation and team-leader evaluation. The final scores reflect the combined result discussed during individual, mid-year and annual review meetings.
New tasks and unfamiliar procedures were understood quickly and transferred into practical work with minimal repeated guidance.
Documented score: 10/10Challenges were approached proactively, systematically and with a strong focus on finding workable solutions.
Documented score: 10/10Independent completion was rated 9/10 because I appropriately involve colleagues when a task cannot be resolved alone rather than concealing uncertainty or risking lower-quality outcomes.
Documented score: 9/10These scores represent structured workplace review outcomes rather than newly invented portfolio ratings.
My strongest contributions emerge when I can investigate a defined analytical problem in depth and build a carefully documented solution.
Defined tasks, fewer interruptions and written priorities help me turn deep concentration into reliable results.
Helpful support: prioritisationClear expectations, advance notice and structured feedback reduce unnecessary ambiguity and cognitive load.
Helpful support: clarityThe cognitive radar combines high learning and reasoning strengths with lower values in areas affected by rapid context switching or simultaneous demands. Lower values indicate where structure or collaboration can improve performance; they are not hidden weaknesses.
The professional radar uses the original 1–10 workplace review scale. All listed areas received a combined score of 10 except independent completion, which received 9 because I ask for help appropriately when a problem cannot be resolved alone.
For collaboration, project enquiries or future opportunities, the best way to reach me is by email.